Press Item

Jan 18, 2010  
TV Hören und sehen Artikel zum 11. September 2001
— Hannes Wellmann
 
originally on 911video.de

German TV Magazin - 9/11 Mysteries

The Secret Files

9/11 is officially the largest criminal case in history- but classified documents and witness account surface,
that speak against the official versions of the CIA and Pentagon

How can you pulverize 200000 tons of steel in 11.4 seconds?
more than 400 meters high, supported by 800 steel beams with a total weight of 200000 tons. The Twin towers were gigantic.
the more astonishing that each of the towers pulverized in 11.4 seconds and the towers came down in free fall speed.
"In order to bring down this kind of mass in such a short period of time, the material must have been artificially ,exploded outwards."
explains the US-engineer Neel Ginson. And really, who looks more closely can see small explosions (see above) in the two towers,
always shortly before the floors are reached by the falling debris.

How long needs a building to burn, before it collapses?
56 minutes after the impact of UA 175 into the South tower this 415 meter high tower collapses. 25 minutes later the North Tower follows, Until today there is no scientific explanation. Even the NIST concludes its inverstigation: In the towers there was a maximal tempretur of 500 degrees celsius, but steel needs 10000 degress to loose stability." Additionally the towers are the first steel frame buildings in the world, that collapse because of of a fire. . Until today it is not clear how people could stand that close to the point of impact.


Why seven hours later still another building collapses?
At 5.20 pm the 174 meter high WTC Turm 7, 100 meters away from the twintowers is suddenly collapsing. But the official 9/11 investigation never mentions the building once. But why is a building collapsingwhen it has not even been hit by a jetliner? How is it possible that asmall fire that has been caused by falling debris of the twin towers, brings down a whole highrise building? And why the BBC already reports at 5 pm about the collapse? Did certain people kown ahead about the events?
Did the government to erase the proof? Fact is that the Pentagon, the CIA and the secret services had offices in the building and thousands of classified files were stored there.


"Boston we have a problem. We have a highjacked plane on our radar screen and we need fighter jets!"
Its 8.38 am when Jeremy Powell from the air defence command receives the radiocall. "Is this a drill?" Powell asks.
"No, this is not a drill." he hears from the speaker. 20 minutes have now passed, since the authorities kwow about the highjacking..
Acoording to standart Nato procedures by now already jetfighters of the air defence would need to be in the air.
QRA - Quick Reaction is an around the clock defence force.. But on 9/11 all 14 jets that were within the QRA radius stayed on the ground..
Only when the highjacked jetliner crashes into the North tower at 8.46 am, the military command calls up 2 fighter jets, that are 190 miles away in Boston.
The most sensible airspace in the world stays unprotected almost for a whole hour.


Did the US-government know more than it admitted and reacted and therefore reacted that late?
"To answer these questions you need to answer the other questions first, that would be asked by anyone conducting a criminal investigation,"
says the US-terrorism expert D.R.Griffin. "Who had a motive? Who profited?" fact is nevertheless; at the beginning of the new millenium
the oil in the Middle East is almost depleted. The weapons industry is in a recession and the influence of other nuclear powers is growing. It is the time when leading US-politicians are dicussin the future US-stategy in the farmework of the "Project for a new America"

The result of the discussion is an document, that is published in September of 2000 and will be the guideline for US-foreign policy for the coming years. Its reads at some point;" The process of transformation will be lasting long, unless the is not cathlytic event -something like Pearl Harbour."

see full article >>