| Chip Franklin - Interview with Richard Gage AIA
|
|
AE911Truth stuns Vancouver with local TV Interview
Time: 20 minutes
Watch the Interview
April 22, 2008
Vancouver
|
|
BlogTalkRadio Interview
BlogTalkRadio Interview
November 2, 2007
Richard Gage makes an intelligent and passionate case for a new independent
investigation into the so called collapses of all three World Trade buildings.
Richard has been a licensed architect for over 20 years and heads ae911truth.org.
|
|
Audio 14MB MP3
9/11 Blueprint: The Architecture of Destruction
September 5, 2007
Interview with Bay Area architect Richard Gage, AIA, about the organization he has
formed, "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth". Outreach
to architects and engineers; presentations to the public and to professionals;
the physical evidence of controlled demolition of the World Trade Center
twin towers and building seven.
|
|
Technical Articles
• Explosives Found in World Trade Center Dust
Jim Hoffman
• Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, and others
• Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials
By Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley, & Steven E. Jones
• Mysteries of the Twin Towers
R. Herbst
• The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis
By Prof. Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti
• Scientists, Scholars, Architects & Engineers respond to NIST
By 16 scientists, scholars, architects, and engineers
• Public comments on the NIST WTC 7 draft report. Submitted to NIST 09/11/08.
Jonathan Cole P.E.
• WTC 7: A Short Computation
Prof. Kenneth L. Kuttler
• Journal of Engineering Mechanics:
Discussion of "Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Center: A Simple Analysis" by K.A. Seffen
Dr. Crockett Grabbe
• Momentum Transfer Analysis of the Collapse of the Upper Stories of WTC 1
Gordon Ross
Journal of 9/11 Studies
• Direct Evidence for Explosions: Flying Projectiles and Widespread Impact Damage
Dr. Crockett Grabbe
More Technical Articles...
|
|
User Profile
My Profile
(Edit Your Info)
|
|
Name:
|
David A. Johnson |
|
Title:
|
Dr., FAICP, Ph.D.
|
|
Degree:
|
BA (Arch) & MCP, Yale; PhD, Cornell
|
|
City:
|
Asheville |
|
State:
|
NC |
|
Country:
|
USA |
|
Category:
|
Architectural Professionals (Degreed) |
|
Discipline:
|
Architecture |
|
Status:
|
Degreed |
|
Bio:
|
David A. Johnson, FAICP, PhD.
Professor Emeritus of Urban and Regional Planning
The University of Tennessee
BA (Architecture), Yale University, '57
Master of City Planning, Yale University, ' '63
PhD, Regional Planning, Cornell University
Author of a number of books and articles on planning American cities, including New York.
|
|
Personal 9/11 Statement:
|
Dear Mr. Gage:
Thank you for taking on the architectural and engineering review of the collapses on 9/11 of the buildings at the World Trade Center site. I was dubious of the official explanations from the outset. You see, as a professional city planner in New York, I knew those buildings and their design. I attended and participated in the hearings at the New York City Hall when the buildings were first proposed. I argued for the buildings on the basis that the interior core represented a way of internalizing the cost of mass transit, which in our system is almost impossible to finance through public bond issues.
So I was well aware of the strength of the core with its steel columns, surrounding the elevators, and stairwells. I should also mention that with a degree in architecture and instruction in steel design (my Yale professor had worked on the Empire State Building) I was and am no novice in structural design.
When I saw the rapid collapse of the towers, I knew that they could not come down the way they did without explosives and the severing of core columns at the base. The spewing of debris from the towers where the planes entered also could not have occurred simply with just a structural collapse. Something else was happening to make this occur.
Moreover, the symmetrical collapse is strong evidence of a controlled demolition. A building falling from asymmetrical structural failure would not collapse so neatly, nor so rapidly, as you have pointed out.
What we are faced with is a lie of such proportions that even to suggest it makes one subject to ridicule and scorn. Who could have done such a terrible thing? Certainly not our government or military. Rogue elements in the intelligence agencies? I have no idea.
But I do know that the official explanation doesn't hold water. An open, honest re-opening of the case is in order. A near majority of Americans agrees with this view. Let us keep pressing for an honest investigation.
|
|
Verification Status:
|
Verified |
Disclaimer: The personal views expressed by Supporters in their Bio's, Personal 9/11 Statements,
and/or other locations on our website, are not necessarily those of AE911Truth.org, Architects and
Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc., its Board Members, employees, volunteers, other supporters,
or any other people officially or unofficially associated or affiliated with AE911Truth.
|
|
|
|
View
North Tower
Blueprints
|
|
Video INN World Report- September 18, 2007 Richard Gage AIA (14:55 minutes into broadcast)